<HEAD><TITLE>discuss@charon: [276] in "Coldmud discussion meeting"</TITLE>
<H1>[276] in Coldmud discussion meeting</H1></HEAD>
<A HREF="/"><IMG SRC="/i-d.gif" ALT="root"></A>
<A HREF="?276"><IMG SRC="/i-back.gif" ALT="meeting"></A>
<A HREF="/help.html"><IMG SRC="/i-help.gif" ALT="help"></A>
<A HREF="1"><IMG SRC="/i-first.gif" ALT="first"></A>
<A HREF="258"><IMG SRC="/i-fref.gif" ALT="first in chain"></A>
<A HREF="271"><IMG SRC="/i-pref.gif" ALT="previous in chain"></A>
<A HREF="275"><IMG SRC="/i-prev.gif" ALT="previous"></A>
<A HREF="277"><IMG SRC="/i-next.gif" ALT="next"></A>
<A HREF="278"><IMG SRC="/i-nref.gif" ALT="next in chain"></A>
<A HREF="302"><IMG SRC="/i-lref.gif" ALT="last in chain"></A>
<A HREF="1641"><IMG SRC="/i-last.gif" ALT="last"></A>
<HR><H2>ports</H2>
<H3>daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Fri May 20 00:17:52 1994
)</H3>
<PRE>
Date: Thu, 19 May 1994 22:14:13 -0600 (MDT)
From: the Lyncx &lt;BRANDON@cc.usu.edu&gt;
To: coldstuff@MIT.EDU
X-Vms-To: COLDSTUFF

I'd like more comments here...

A: what do _you_ feel about moving the default port to the 5xxx range?
   the 9xxx range?

B: what do you feel about having a few "known" basic ports, such as those
   including a fingerd, login, and a few other simple services?

   would you mind following the scheme:

      login:     xxx0
      portmapper xxx1
      fingerd    xxx2

   etc?  (i.e. login 5550 portmapper 5551 fingerd 5552 etc).

For simplicity we could define login as whatever x number we use (i.e. login
with 5xxx woudl be 5555 or 9xxx would be 9999).

-Brandon-
</PRE>
