<HEAD><TITLE>discuss@charon: [520] in "Coldmud discussion meeting"</TITLE>
<H1>[520] in Coldmud discussion meeting</H1></HEAD>
<A HREF="/"><IMG SRC="/i-d.gif" ALT="root"></A>
<A HREF="?520"><IMG SRC="/i-back.gif" ALT="meeting"></A>
<A HREF="/help.html"><IMG SRC="/i-help.gif" ALT="help"></A>
<A HREF="1"><IMG SRC="/i-first.gif" ALT="first"></A>
<IMG SRC="/n-fref.gif" ALT="">
<IMG SRC="/n-pref.gif" ALT="">
<A HREF="519"><IMG SRC="/i-prev.gif" ALT="previous"></A>
<A HREF="521"><IMG SRC="/i-next.gif" ALT="next"></A>
<IMG SRC="/n-nref.gif" ALT="">
<IMG SRC="/n-lref.gif" ALT="">
<A HREF="1641"><IMG SRC="/i-last.gif" ALT="last"></A>
<HR><H2>sigh..</H2>
<H3>daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Fri Nov  4 22:10:25 1994
)</H3>
<PRE>
From: Alex Stewart &lt;riche@crl.com&gt;
To: coldstuff@MIT.EDU
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 1994 19:08:21 -0800 (PST)

Well, since Colin doesn't seem to believe anything I say unless he sees it on
coldstuff..

The "to-do" about in-DB message resolution should go under "Up for Discussion"
instead.  I made a mistake when I posted that message.  I am still considering
that particular implementation and no, I'm not set on it, and in fact I'm
probably not going to go with it for a couple of reasons.. I'll most likely
settle on an alternative involving catching calls to undefined methods on the
receiving object.

sheesh.

-R
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Alex Stewart - riche@crl.com - Richelieu @ Diversity University MOO
              ftp://ftp.crl.com/users/ro/riche/html/riche.html
</PRE>
