[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

# [PROG] E_PROPNF v. E_VERBNF

- Date: Fri, 27 Oct 1995 20:41:17 PDT
- From:
- Content-Length: 573
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

    Suppose there an object #A defines a property .example and a verb :example(),
    and suppose #B is a child of #A.  Then although #B inherits both of these from
    #A,

    ;property_info(#B, "example")
    => okay

    ;verb_info(#B, "example")
    => E_VERBNF  (assuming that #B doesn't itself define a verb :example() )

    Shouldn't both of these return errors, or else both be okay?  I know that
    inheritance has no effect on the rwxd flags of a verb, while an inherited
    property can have different rwc values than its parent's property, but still,
    it seems a little inconsistent....

    michael

Follow-Ups:

- Re: [PROG] E_PROPNF v. E_VERBNF

- From: Ian Macintosh <ian@iman.internet.co.nz>

- Re: [PROG] E_PROPNF v. E_VERBNF

- From: Joe Shaw <joeshaw@eskimo.com>

- Prev: [HACK] Re: in-db parsing problem
- Next: Re: [PROG] E_PROPNF v. E_VERBNF
- Index: MOO-cows
- Thread: MOO-cows

Home | Subject Index | Thread Index