[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

# Re: An alternate proposal for MOO-Cows

- Date: Wed, 17 May 1995 05:07:11 PDT
- From:
- Reply-To:
- Cc: MOO-Cows@parc.xerox.com
- Content-Length: 526
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
- In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 17 May 1995 00:17:13 PDT." <9505170617.AA0230@localhost>

      I prefer this proposal over the SUMMARY based idea. This holds
    substantially more value for those of us who are using MOO for non-MUD
    CMCs. It would allow me to focus on SERVER, APROG, PROG, CORE, and NET,
    and ignore Lambda and MUDish subjects.

    thanks,
    christian

    -----
    Christian A. Ratliff    / Sales Systems Analyst  / ratlifc@ctron.com
    (NeXTmail & MIME okay)  / Webmaster & Consultant / ratlifc@biddeford.com
                            / Coauthor of lily       / ratlifc@lily.org
    httpd://www.biddeford.com/~ratlifc/

References:

- An alternate proposal for MOO-Cows

- From: Alex Stewart <riche@crl.com>

- Prev: An alternate proposal for MOO-Cows
- Next: Re: An alternate proposal for MOO-Cows
- Index: MOO-cows
- Thread: MOO-cows

Home | Subject Index | Thread Index