[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

# Re: Minimal.DB

- Date: Tue, 14 Nov 1995 16:56:08 PST
- From:
- cc: MOO-Cows.PARC@xerox.com
- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
- In-Reply-to: <199511142216.RAA10704@arkady.hygnet.com>

    On Tue, 14 Nov 1995, Seth I. Rich wrote:

    > So I was once again hacking minimal.db, and I notice that I'm always
    > starting with the same steps.  Why doesn't minimal.db consist of a single
    > object, #0, which is a player and a programmer and a wizard, with a
    > :do_login_command verb which returns #0?  I don't see any reason for
    > minimal.db to contain a room or root parents at all.

    I agree.. I immediately recycled everything and started coding AS #0.  In
    the MOO now, #1-owned verbs are wizpermed, and #0-owned verbs aren't.
    Like a $hacker.  I suggest setting up an easy login and $room so other
    wizzes may log in and communicate easily. (for those doing a social-type moo)

    - Kipp

Follow-Ups:

- Re: Minimal.DB

- From: Ian Macintosh <ian@iman.internet.co.nz>

References:

- Minimal.DB

- From: "Seth I. Rich" <sir@po.cwru.edu>

- Prev: Re: Minimal.DB
- Next: Re: Minimal.DB
- Index: MOO-cows
- Thread: MOO-cows

Home | Subject Index | Thread Index