[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

# Re: Porting MOO objects

- Date: Wed, 29 Nov 1995 14:33:37 PST
- From:
- Reply-To:
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.91.951129135353.9368A-100000@yeehaw.com> (message from Bill Garrett on Wed, 29 Nov 1995 13:01:13 PST)

    Defender (Bill Garrett <bill@yeehaw.com> writes:
    >> Not true. Its a bit buggy to get working sometimes and it does have
    >> problems with massive lag but all in all it works.. I've used it alot
    >> porting stuff between the two of the moo's I'm a wizard on.
    >
    >Autoport's setup routine was kinna tweaky for awhile, but the version on
    >RiverMOO (river.honors.indiana.edu 8888) has been fixed.
    >I've been working on a more robust version of a porting system, contained
    >on an object rather than in one verb.
    >The version on River also checks to see if your MOO's nameserver
    >processes are down, and warns you accordingly.
    >I've used the verb successfully for a long time.

    Great agreement here.  I used the new utilities to do a massive
    port of several hundred objects and characters with great success.

    What the MOO world needs is a correspondance database of MOO objects
    between MOOs...

        /t

    Tom Ritchford     tom@mvision.com   (212) 306-0414
    Market Vision, 40 Rector Street, NY, NY 10006

    Verge's "Little Idiot" -- Music for the mentally peculiar.
    1-800-WEIRDOS           http://www.fly.net/~tom/verge.html

References:

- Re: Porting MOO objects

- From: Bill Garrett <bill@yeehaw.com>

- Prev: Re: Porting MOO objects
- Next: Re: Porting MOO objects
- Index: MOO-cows
- Thread: MOO-cows

Home | Subject Index | Thread Index