# Minimal.DB

Kipp the Kidd (mcmudge@mailbox.syr.edu)
Tue, 14 Nov 1995 16:56:08 PST

- Messages sorted by:[ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

    On Tue, 14 Nov 1995, Seth I. Rich wrote:

    > So I was once again hacking minimal.db, and I notice that I'm always
    > starting with the same steps.  Why doesn't minimal.db consist of a single
    > object, #0, which is a player and a programmer and a wizard, with a
    > :do_login_command verb which returns #0?  I don't see any reason for
    > minimal.db to contain a room or root parents at all.

    I agree.. I immediately recycled everything and started coding AS #0.  In
    the MOO now, #1-owned verbs are wizpermed, and #0-owned verbs aren't.
    Like a $hacker.  I suggest setting up an easy login and $room so other
    wizzes may log in and communicate easily. (for those doing a social-type moo)

    - Kipp