[276] in Coldmud discussion meeting

root meeting help first first in chain previous in chain previous next next in chain last in chain last


daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Fri May 20 00:17:52 1994 )

Date: Thu, 19 May 1994 22:14:13 -0600 (MDT)
From: the Lyncx <BRANDON@cc.usu.edu>
To: coldstuff@MIT.EDU

I'd like more comments here...

A: what do _you_ feel about moving the default port to the 5xxx range?
   the 9xxx range?

B: what do you feel about having a few "known" basic ports, such as those
   including a fingerd, login, and a few other simple services?

   would you mind following the scheme:

      login:     xxx0
      portmapper xxx1
      fingerd    xxx2

   etc?  (i.e. login 5550 portmapper 5551 fingerd 5552 etc).

For simplicity we could define login as whatever x number we use (i.e. login
with 5xxx woudl be 5555 or 9xxx would be 9999).