in Coldmud discussion meeting
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Fri May 20 00:17:52 1994
Date: Thu, 19 May 1994 22:14:13 -0600 (MDT)
From: the Lyncx <BRANDON@cc.usu.edu>
I'd like more comments here...
A: what do _you_ feel about moving the default port to the 5xxx range?
the 9xxx range?
B: what do you feel about having a few "known" basic ports, such as those
including a fingerd, login, and a few other simple services?
would you mind following the scheme:
etc? (i.e. login 5550 portmapper 5551 fingerd 5552 etc).
For simplicity we could define login as whatever x number we use (i.e. login
with 5xxx woudl be 5555 or 9xxx would be 9999).