[372] in Coldmud discussion meeting
Re: Changes (0.10-4)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mon Jul 11 00:24:21 1994
)
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 1994 00:16:58 -0400
From: Quinn Avery <quinn@Access.Mountain.Net>
To: BRANDON@cc.usu.edu, coldstuff@MIT.EDU
:| set_name() => set_objname()
:| del_name() => del_objname()
:| get_name() => get_objnum()
I thought your choice for these was name->dbref? I prefer "dbref" over
"objname".
:| has_ancestor() => remove (we can just do 'if obj in
:| (.ancestors())', although
:| it isn't as fast).
Don't see the point in removing this. The cores existing now may not
have very long, tangled parentages, but it might be a good idea to
assume they may one day and keep this in for speed.
-Quinn ("Shut up, Quinn. You aren't using Cold anyway.")