[373] in Coldmud discussion meeting
Re: Changes (0.10-4)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mon Jul 11 00:42:20 1994
)
From: image@sage.cc.purdue.edu (Jeff T.P.)
To: BRANDON@cc.usu.edu
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 94 23:37:00 EST
In-Reply-To: <01HEK09N914MCU5PG2@cc.usu.edu>; from "BRANDON@cc.usu.edu" at Jul 10, 94 9:21 pm
Original quote by BRANDON@cc.usu.edu:
> set_heartbeat_freq() => set_heartbeat() (this is completely aesthetic)
> db_top => max_objnum() (ditto)
I support the above. Two builtins that were misnamed. I like the
above suggestions.
> has_ancestor() => remove (we can just do 'if obj in (.ancestors())', although
> it isn't as fast).
What's the speed difference? If the speed difference is a large one,
then by all means leave has_ancestor() in, but it doesn't seem like it
should be very large.
> dict_add_elem()
> dict_del_elem() => remove (since they are disappearing anyway)
I know I have very important code that uses both of these extensively.
I'd like to have them left in personally. I know it can be done in db,
but how quickly? Speed again is the consideration. If it can be done in
the database without considerable loss of speed, then nevermind. . .
Coming Soon. . . a WWW Page for RyouKold (Concepts and Documentation).
--
ftp://maddog.evansville.edu/pub/mud/home.html "All of the rumours
AKA:tailor@maddog.evansville.edu keeping me grounded
I never said that they were
Completely Unfounded." -- Morrissey, Speedway from "Vauxhall and I"