in Coldmud discussion meeting
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Wed Sep 21 01:50:26 1994
From: email@example.com (Robert de Forest)
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 1994 22:42:59 -0700 (PDT)
0.12's pause() resumes whenver all input has been handled, not at the next
I still see no need for creation of new tasks. At least, I don't see a reason
why waiting for the next heartbeat is a problem. If it can be explained to me
why one second is too long to wait then Riche's solution seems amicable.