[749] in Coldmud discussion meeting

root meeting help first first in chain previous in chain previous next next in chain last in chain last

Re: error_arg,error_str

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Thu May 25 11:52:49 1995 )

Date: Thu, 25 May 1995 11:52:36 -0400
From: Quinn <quinn@Access.Mountain.Net>
To: brandon@avon.declab.usu.edu, coldstuff@MIT.EDU

:| It is a little more clunky, but error_[arg|str]() would just be
:| redundant, now that traceback() returns intelligent output.

Yes, and I'd agree--if error() had been removed.  But error() is
 still there, even though it's the same as traceback()[1][1]. So
 why get rid of the others?

(It is the same as traceback()[1][1], isn't it?)