[832] in Coldmud discussion meeting

root meeting help first previous next next in chain last in chain last

Re: connections

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tue Oct 17 17:49:52 1995 )

Date: Tue, 17 Oct 1995 15:26:18 -0600
From: 869683 Gillespie Brandon James <brandon@avon.declab.usu.edu>
To: coldstuff@pippin.ece.usu.edu

Eric Weber spaketh:
< Gillespie Brandon James writes:
< > The main reason is that for cleanliness I only think you should have one
< > connection per object, it is cleaner this way...
< Surely this could be done in-DB, thus leaving the door open to
< the idea of services which can handle multiple connections.

I did consider that, but the question has to be asked: why?  Having two
means of doing the same would add confusion and complexity to a really
simple system.  It would require adding more functions to control the
connections at a higher level.  Objects really do not have much of an
overhead as it is...