[942] in Coldmud discussion meeting
Re: [COLD] regular expressions
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sat Mar 23 17:08:41 1996
)
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 1996 14:55:32 -0700 (MST)
From: Brandon Gillespie <brandon@tombstone.sunrem.com>
To: coldstuff@cold.org
In-Reply-To: <199603222335.AAA29121@regoc.srce.hr>
On Sat, 23 Mar 1996, Miroslav Silovic wrote:
> > Since there is a POSIX standard for regular expressions, should we hook into
> > the system regular expressions if they exist, resorting to our own regexp
> > code if it does not?
> >
> > The problems which could arise with this is that the current POSIX
> > standard seems to be somewhat vague, leaving openings for interpretation
> > by implementors. Basically, certain aspects of regular expressions could
> > change depending on what OS the driver is running under.
>
> I think we should use Perl regexp (if you feel like isolating its
> source). At least I can tell which characters need to be backslashed and
> when in Perl regexp. :) It's also somewhat standard and powerful
> enough.
Uhh, so by 'perl regexp' you mean you want henry spencer's regexp package
with perly extensions? Basically, the extended \x meanings, like \s, \d,
etc?