Well, it suited my purposes and the platform that I use (which
is why I set about doing it), however, I'm more than willing to port the work
into whatever format suits the furtherance of ColdC best. :-)
ian
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, November 29, 1999 5:32
AM
Subject: Re: Reference Manual
updates
"Ian Klimon, Esq." <ian@aephirsden.com>
writes:
> I've found Word to be quite useful for indexing and table
of > contents. I wanted it in a format that I could read offline
that > clearly delineated the sections, etc, Word seemed to be
the > appropriate way to achieve this.
It is -a- way to achive
this, but being tied to a single OS, very hard to convert to anything else
(without major losses in markup) - in particular very hard to convert to
CML - it's definitely not the appropriate way. Docbook (SGML), LaTeX or
even texinfo are all superior by the criteria above (both allow sections,
can be printed and read offline, allow indexing and TOC... and are bloody
portable).
-- How to eff the
ineffable?
|