[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Subject Index][Thread Index]

# Re: Checkpoint Problems Continue

- Date: Sat, 26 Jul 1997 18:14:17 -0400 (EDT)
- From:
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
- In-Reply-To: <199707262133.RAA16732@linux.datadriven.com> from "Jay Shepherd" at Jul 26, 97 04:31:23 pm

    Jay Shepherd mumbled:
    >
    > This worked!

    Interesting...

    >
    > I changed the code to just be:
    >
    > notify(#95, "CP!");
    >
    > and it worked..
    >
    > Sooo what does this mean?  Maybe someone was right when they said there is
    > some sort of internal error that is happening when run by the server that
    > works when you call it directly.

    Unlikely.
    Verbs called by the server have a few funky propertie that make
    ordinary verbs blow up in interesting ways:

    player => #-1
    caller_perms() => #-1
    caller => #-1
    callers() => {}

    Evalling the following may give you the proper traceback:

    ;;player = #-1; set_task_perms(#-1); #0:

    -manta

References:

- Re: Checkpoint Problems Continue

- From: "Jay Shepherd" <js@datadriven.com>

- Prev by Subject: Re: Checkpoint Problems Continue
- Next by Subject: Re: Checkpoint Problems Continue
- Prev by thread: Re: Checkpoint Problems Continue
- Next by thread: Re: Checkpoint Problems Continue
- Index(es):
  - Subject
  - Thread

Home | Subject Index | Thread Index