# [kent@cme.nist.gov: Re: New patch release 1.8.0p6 of LambdaMOO server and manual]

"Robert J. Brown" (rj@eli.wariat.org)
Mon, 10 Mar 1997 16:21:09 -0600

- Messages sorted by:[ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

    ------- Start of forwarded message -------
    Return-Path: nop@ccs.neu.edu
    Date: Mon, 10 Mar 1997 08:02:17 PST
    From: kent@cme.nist.gov (Ernie Kent)
    To: moo-cows@parc.xerox.com, kbobrow@parc.xerox.com
    Subject: Re: New patch release 1.8.0p6 of LambdaMOO server and manual
    Sender: MOO-Cows-Errors@parc.xerox.com
    Precedence: bulk
    Resent-From: clue-cows <nop@nop.com>
    Errors-To: clue-cows <nop@nop.com>

    Kimberly Bobrow <kbobrow@parc.xerox.com> wrote:

    > A more substantially changed version of the server (1.9.0) is
    > underway, and may appear in April.  It will be available under the
    > same terms that previous versions have been distributed under, except
    > that it will assert AT&T's copyright over the new material, and give
    > my name and address instead of Pavel's.  I may give it a name

    Can you explain AT&T's interpretation of 'the same terms'? Also, what
    are the implications of the AT&T copyright according to AT&T?
    I'm a bit gun-shy on this after some of the discussion concerning Xerox's
    refusal to affirm or deny the terms Pavel printed on the previous versions.

    Thanks
    ------- End of forwarded message -------