[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

# FUP vs. fileio

- Date: Sat, 22 Feb 1997 05:52:14 PST
- From:
- Comments: Authenticated sender is <cecil@mail.iaw.on.ca>
- Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
- Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
- Priority: normal

    Okay, comments from the newbie here, but oh well. I just thought I'd
    say that I much prefer FUP's ability to input binary characters in
    normal strings.
       I don't use it a great deal, but when I do, I generally make sure I
    know what I'm doing, so as to not corrupt the database as
    mentioned before. (this is fairly hard to do accidentally, isn't it?
    seems like it)
       It's also fairly useful for when you /need/ binary characters, for
    example, when installing ANSI. (It refers to a chr() patch that you
    can get, as an alternative... anyone know where this can be
    obtained?)
        I dunno about the rest of you, but the MOO's form of binary
    strings just don't cut it for me. :) Now, if only binary strings
    could be displayed as binary without having to set the whole
    connection binary. (ick)

    Anyway, that's just my comment on the matter. :)

Follow-Ups:

- Re: FUP vs. fileio

- From: Brack <slayer@kaiwan.com>

- Re: FUP vs. fileio

- From: Chris Jones <cjones@freenet.edmonton.ab.ca>

- Prev: Re: A FUP programming question
- Next: Re: FUP vs. fileio
- Index: MOO-cows
- Thread: MOO-cows

Home | Subject Index | Thread Index