[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Subject Index][Thread Index]

# Re: Problem with Checkpoints

- Date: Tue, 15 Jul 1997 11:26:48 -0500
- From:
- Cc: <moo-cows@the-b.org>
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

    No, there are very few verbs on #0, just the basics.  This is virtually a
    fresh core.

    ----------
    > From: Seth I. Rich <seth@Op.Net>
    > To: Jay Shepherd <js@datadriven.com>
    > Cc: yduj@CS.Stanford.EDU; moo-cows@the-b.org
    > Subject: Re: Problem with Checkpoints
    > Date: Tuesday, July 15, 1997 11:15 AM
    >
    > > I just checked and the verbs are +x.  What is odd, is that it was
    working
    > > at some point, and I think that maybe it stopped around the time we
    switch
    > > to byte based quota.
    >
    > Are there other verbs on #0 with names such that they would be called
    > instead of the verbs you're considering?
    >
    > Seth
    > --
    > -------------------------------------------------------------------
    > Seth I. Rich - seth@op.net            Rabbits on walls, no problem.

- Prev by Subject: Re: Problem with Checkpoints
- Next by Subject: Re: read() and force_input()
- Prev by thread: Re: Problem with Checkpoints
- Next by thread: Plugin interface
- Index(es):
  - Subject
  - Thread

Home | Subject Index | Thread Index