[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Subject Index][Thread Index]

# re:hash & balanced trees

- Date: Tue, 1 Jul 1997 08:13:42 -0400 (EDT)
- From:
- cc: moo-cows@the-b.org
- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
- In-Reply-To: <v03102800afde334441f5@[205.151.119.249]>

    > That's fine for mutable data type... but unless I'm mistaken MOO lists
    > are not.
    Not sure that one would want to replace the moo list data type with a hash
    or tree.  Rather, by adding new builtin support for alternative types, it
    gives programmers a choice.

    Why not add both a $hash and a $tree =8?

    l8r,
    v

Follow-Ups:

- Re: hash & balanced trees

- From: Erik Ostrom <eostrom@research.att.com>

- Re: hash & balanced trees

- From: Jay Carlson <nop@nop.com>

References:

- re:hash & balanced trees

- From: Richard Godard <janus@cam.org>

- Prev by Subject: re:hash & balanced trees
- Next by Subject: Re: hash & balanced trees
- Prev by thread: re:hash & balanced trees
- Next by thread: Re: hash & balanced trees
- Index(es):
  - Subject
  - Thread

Home | Subject Index | Thread Index