Re: discussion notes, and more list members

[Dave Kormann <davek@research.att.com>]

 >> 	are keywords beginning with '_' going to be reserved for
 >> 	future use of the protocol?  eg: '_data-tag'.
 > 
 > Hadn't thought about it that clearly, but HEY, good idea.  Can we do
 > that?

i'm pretty fond of this idea; one question is, is it valuable to have
this when most of the MCP reserved arguments _don't_ use the
underscore convention?  besides cord messages, for which arguments do
we forsee using this?
				dk