Re: hrm

[Dave Kormann <davek@research.att.com>]

 > I'd go a step further and link cord types explicitly to protocol
 > names.  I.e., just as you can only create messages that have a prefix
 > which you own (say, "dns-com-att-research-twin-edit"), you can only
 > create cord names that have a prefix which you own.  note that this
 > can be a non-strict prefix, e.g., if there's a "twin" protocol, we
 > could have a "twin" cord type and a "twin" message.

ok, i'd like to pretty much say, then, something along the lines of
'the same rules apply to cord names as protocol names', is this ok
with everyone?
				dk