[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: practical matters (was Re: tired of waiting)
> > i'd very much like to have a naming authority defined by the time we
> > finalize the spec. anybody willing to, uh, be it?
> i'm willing to be acting name czar unless somebody outside AT&T can do
> it. i think it _might_ be best to have a nominally independent third
> party handling naming. that could well be one of the people (or a
> group of the people) on this list.
Forgive me for asking a redundant question. For the record, what does
AT&T have to do with the formation and management of MCP and attendant
procedures. (and MOO also??!)...
> as an alternative which is possibly too hairy to contemplate, we could
> make things a little more decentralized: set up a public, moderated
> mailing list for name requests; registration requests are mailed to
> this list. if any list member objects to allocating, we vote or
> something. otherwise, the name is automatically approved after some
> period of time. this seems like a good way to keep the namespace
> allocation process open. if you want a voice in the naming authority,
> you join the list.