while we're restricting things ..

[Dave Kormann <davek@research.att.com>]

 > It would be nice to specify that all messages need to have a name for
 > asthetic reasons and again to eliminate another special case in
 > message dispatch.
 > 
 > --ken
 > 

i don't like this; i really like that you can have one-message
protocols consisting only of the protocol name.  a number of things
make use of this fact, and it seems to be a net win.  otherwise, you
end up with cruft like
#$#mcp-edit-edit
or something.
				dk