[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

re: 2.0

To: Erik Ostrom <eostrom@research.att.com>
Subject: re: 2.0
From: Dave Kormann <davek@research.att.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 1997 17:39:57 -0400 (EDT)
CC: mcp-dev@research.att.com
In-Reply-To: <199704292043.QAA07510@radish.research.att.com>
References: <199704292043.QAA07510@radish.research.att.com>

 > might also be worth stating explicitly that if you understand ranges
 > 1.0 to 2.1 and you communicate with someone who states version ranges
 > 1.0 to 2.0, you're stuck with 1.0 for common ground.

did i miss something?  why is this the case?
				dk

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.0
  - From: Erik Ostrom <eostrom@research.att.com>

References:
- 2.0
  - From: Erik Ostrom <eostrom@research.att.com>

Prev by Date: 2.0
Next by Date: Re: Message arguments for chords...
Prev by thread: 2.0
Next by thread: Re: 2.0
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread