Re: Unsupported message behaviour...

[Andrew Wilson <a.wilson@elsevier.co.uk>]

Dave Kormann:
> in other news, after talking with jay and ken this weekend, i'm
> thinking about #$#MCP-protocol-end again.  this message would end the
> negotiation phase.  i'm not terribly happy with it, mostly because i
> really want to keep dynamic loading as a possibility, but i don't have
> a strong enough case to make to fight adding it, i think.
> 
> any objections, then, to adding #$#mcp-protocol-end?
> 				dk

The semantics being what?  Once you receive mcp-protocol-end simply
ignore all subsequent protocol negotiation silently?

Ay

-- 
Andrew.Wilson@cm.cs.ac.uk          http://www.cs.cf.ac.uk/User/Andrew.Wilson/