[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: MCP 2.1

> as for the comment about multiple identical keywords: i'm going to by
> fiat say that you take the first one and throw away the rest, and that
> compliant implementations should never ever ever ever send duplicate
> keywords.  any objections or alternative suggestions?

I suggest you take the last one and throw away the rest.  That way you
can but the key/value pairs in a hash table and the last one you put
there is the one you want.