[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[disc] cord type support
| On receipt of this message, an implementation should check if the
| specified type is understood. The semantics of "is understood" are
| fuzzy and up to the implementation -- most implementations will
| presumably provide some way for code to indicate its support of a
| particular cord type.
We tied cord names to protocol names, right? (The cord named "foo-bar-baz" is
necessarily a part of the protocol "foo-bar"--or the protocol "foo", maybe,
this is unclear.) I think what I wanted to imply by that was that protocol
definitions may include cord types. So, a cord is understood if the protocol
to which it belongs is understood. Right?