Re: official release

[Erik Ostrom <eostrom@research.att.com>]

> I was going to make some remark about how it would be cool if by 
> private agreement clients and servers could support multiple auth 
> keys to model different levels of trust (such as blessed-by-server-adm
> ins and something-Networker-did) but I realized that there's really 
> no point in including this in the spec at this point, especially 
> given authkey checking is worded as a "should" now anyway.

yes indeed.  i actually think there are a large number of "private
agreement" things that will be experimented with, and i see no reason
to put any of them in the spec.