[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: official release
From: Erik Ostrom <email@example.com>
> I was going to make some remark about how it would be cool if by
> private agreement clients and servers could support multiple auth
> keys to model different levels of trust (such as blessed-by-server-adm
> ins and something-Networker-did) but I realized that there's really
> no point in including this in the spec at this point, especially
> given authkey checking is worded as a "should" now anyway.
yes indeed. i actually think there are a large number of "private
agreement" things that will be experimented with, and i see no reason
to put any of them in the spec.