Re: official release

[Vijay Saraswat <vj@research.att.com>]

   From: Erik Ostrom <eostrom@research.att.com>

   > I was going to make some remark about how it would be cool if by 
   > private agreement clients and servers could support multiple auth 
   > keys to model different levels of trust (such as blessed-by-server-adm
   > ins and something-Networker-did) but I realized that there's really 
   > no point in including this in the spec at this point, especially 
   > given authkey checking is worded as a "should" now anyway.

   yes indeed.  i actually think there are a large number of "private
   agreement" things that will be experimented with, and i see no reason
   to put any of them in the spec.

Right.