[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [mcp-negotiate] spec and implementation Qs...

At 11:17 -0500 1/24/98, Erik Ostrom wrote:
>"to block on" means approximately "to wait for".  dave, i think "block
>on" is too... idiomatic here and should be changed before we finish.
>i think "wait for" works.

Yes, "wait for" would be clearer (at least for someone not fluent in
English, like me :)

>well, the intent was that both implementations send out a list of all
>packages they support immediately after the mcp version is
>negotiated.  preference is something that's handled implicitly or
>negotiated by a protocol outside the scope of this spec.

Ok, thanks for the clarification.