[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: data tag

To: mcp-dev@research.att.com
Subject: Re: data tag
From: Richard Godard <richard.godard@tecfa.unige.ch>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 1998 01:12:52 -0500
In-Reply-To: <199801260558.AAA10949@bual.research.att.com>
Sender: owner-mcp-dev@research.att.com

At 0:58 -0500 1/26/98, Erik Ostrom wrote:
>i believe _data-tag is the name we've used in discussions.  however,
>now that i look at it again (siiigh), _data-tag is an invalid
>identifier and hence an invalid keyword.  (so is _data_tag.)

Nope, _data-tag, _data_tag, _id and _type are all valid <ident> since '_'
is in the <alpha> and
<ident> ::= <alpha> <ident-chars>

References:
- data tag
  - From: Erik Ostrom <eostrom@research.att.com>

Prev by Date: wording change
Next by Date: data tag, part 2
Prev by thread: data tag
Next by thread: Re: data tag
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread