[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

another nit

more in the stream of "we should've fixed this before calling it final
but it's pretty minor so can we just do it?":

>Cords are not, strictly speaking, part of MCP 2.1, and compliant
>implementations are not required to support them. 

of course, they ARE a part of mcp 2.1, or they wouldn't be in the spec
and they wouldn't be called mcp-cord.  sure, they're an OPTIONAL part,
but they're still there.

any objections to this change?