[372] in Coldmud discussion meeting

root meeting help first first in chain previous in chain previous next next in chain last in chain last

Re: Changes (0.10-4)

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mon Jul 11 00:24:21 1994 )

Date: Mon, 11 Jul 1994 00:16:58 -0400
From: Quinn Avery <quinn@Access.Mountain.Net>
To: BRANDON@cc.usu.edu, coldstuff@MIT.EDU

:| set_name()    => set_objname()
:| del_name()    => del_objname()
:| get_name()    => get_objnum()

I thought your choice for these was name->dbref?  I prefer "dbref" over

:| has_ancestor() => remove  (we can just do 'if obj in
:| (.ancestors())', although
:|                            it isn't as fast).

Don't see the point in removing this.  The cores existing now may not
 have very long, tangled parentages, but it might be a good idea to
 assume they may one day and keep this in for speed.

-Quinn ("Shut up, Quinn.  You aren't using Cold anyway.")